learning and thinking styles pdf

Learning And Thinking Styles Pdf

File Name: learning and thinking styles .zip
Size: 1797Kb
Published: 19.05.2021

Skip to content. Skip to navigation. Most people can be flexible and organised, learn from mistakes and imagine things they have not experienced. We recognise similarities and from experience apply tried solutions to new problems.

Thinking and Learning Style

Skip to search form Skip to main content You are currently offline. Some features of the site may not work correctly. The study aimed to recognize The Thinking styles "in light of Sternberg's theory" prevailing among the students of Tafila Technical University and its relationship with some Variables. The sample consisted of students male and female chosen in stratified, clustered and random method. The researcher used a list of methods for Sternberg and Wagner for the instrument of the study. Save to Library.

While most of us fall across the spectrum of each of these styles, facilitating lessons that are engaging on all levels will give your students the best chance of success. Auditory learners like to hear solutions and examples explained to them, and may gravitate towards music subjects and group learning as a way to understand information. Auditory learners often have a high aptitude for distinguishing notes and tones in music and speech. Auditory learners might say words out loud or hum tones to better learn them. This strategy is key for keeping musical learners engaged in class lessons. Auditory learners will be engaged from start to finish. For other subjects however, engaging aural learners requires some tact and forethought.

Allowing for Thinking Styles

Show all documents Thinking styles: A study on secondary school students Education worldwide is changing, and thus the preference given to classroom learning alone has been replaced by constructive learning in which learners are not just passive listeners. Although human beings share many important characteristics, they also differ from one another in significant ways. To understand, or apply one has to employ the powers of thinking. The way in which an individual thinks or perceives a problem has come across a drastic change due to the rapid growth of science and technology.

Learning styles refer to a range of competing and contested theories that aim to account for differences in individuals' learning. The idea of individualized learning styles became popular in the s, [3] and has greatly influenced education despite the criticism that the idea has received from some researchers. Studies further show that teachers cannot assess the learning style of their students accurately. There are many different learning styles models; one literature review identified 71 different models. David A. Kolb 's model is based on his experiential learning model, as explained in his book Experiential Learning. In order for learning to be effective, Kolb postulated, all four of these approaches must be incorporated.

Thinking Styles

All of us, including our students, have preferred ways of learning. Teachers often refer to these differences as learning styles , though this term may imply that students are more consistent across situations than is really the case. One student may like to make diagrams to help remember a reading assignment, whereas another student may prefer to write a sketchy outline instead.

Top PDF Thinking styles: A study on secondary school students

Allowing for Thinking Styles

Akbarzadeh, M. Study of personal and educational factors associated with thinking styles and its relationship to academic achievement among students of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. Unpublished M.

To browse Academia. Skip to main content. By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies. To learn more, view our Privacy Policy. Log In Sign Up.


PDF | This paper presents the results of a pilot study conducted with second and The similarity in learning style response from all the engineering students that.


Results of the study indicated that: The thinking styles between the two studies were significantly different. The means of legislative, judicial, monarchic, hierarchic, external and liberal thinking styles were significantly reduced among the students from year to year Results of the study also indicated that the thinking styles among the male and female students were significantly different. The means of executive and monarchic styles were higher in female students, whereas the mean of judicial style was higher in male students. From the results of the study it may be concluded that the thinking styles can be changed over the time.

By keying teaching and assessment techniques to the diverse ways people think and learn, teachers will be surprised at how much smarter their students get. When I received a C in my introductory psychology course, I concluded and my teacher concurred that I did not have the ability to pursue my true interest and intended major— psychology. I decided to switch to mathematics. But discovering that I had even less ability in that subject, I returned to psychology; three years later I was graduated summa cum laude with exceptional distinction in that field. As a high school student I had a similar experience.

International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence pp Cite as. Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

0 comments

Leave a comment

it’s easy to post a comment

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>